External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar recently delivered a powerful message outlining India’s foreign policy approach, particularly concerning its challenging neighbourhood. His remarks, implicitly referencing Pakistan, underscored India’s resolve in the face of persistent terrorism and its unwavering commitment to strategic autonomy. This discourse not only clarifies India’s immediate concerns but also illuminates its long-term vision for regional stability, free from external interference.
“Bad Neighbours” and the Right to Self-Defense:
Minister Jaishankar’s candid description of “bad neighbours” leaves little doubt about the nation he was alluding to. For decades, India has grappled with cross-border terrorism, an issue that has repeatedly tested its patience and security apparatus. The minister’s assertion of India’s inherent right to self-defense against such aggression is not merely a diplomatic statement; it reflects a fundamental principle of sovereignty and national security. It signifies that India will not be a passive recipient of hostile actions but will actively protect its citizens and its borders. This stance is a clear warning that persistent state-sponsored or enabled terrorism will invite a robust response.
Embracing Strategic Autonomy:
A cornerstone of India’s foreign policy, strategic autonomy, was another key theme in Jaishankar’s address. He categorically dismissed notions of external mediation in India’s bilateral disputes, particularly with Pakistan. This emphasis highlights India’s belief in its own capacity to manage its affairs and its refusal to allow third parties to dictate its foreign policy choices. Strategic autonomy ensures that India’s decisions are based on its national interests, rather than being swayed by the agendas of other global powers. In an increasingly multipolar world, this independent approach allows India to forge diverse partnerships and maintain flexibility, positioning itself as a responsible global player capable of charting its own course.
Impact on Bilateral Pacts: The Indus Waters Treaty:
Perhaps one of the most significant implications of continued hostility, as highlighted by Jaishankar, is its corrosive effect on existing agreements, even foundational ones like the Indus Waters Treaty. This treaty, a landmark agreement governing the sharing of river waters between India and Pakistan, has largely withstood numerous conflicts and diplomatic breakdowns since its inception in 1960. Jaishankar’s statement that “no nation can be a victim of terrorism and be expected to be normal with the country that is sponsoring it” and that “goodwill underpins agreements” sends a powerful signal. It implies that while India has historically upheld its treaty obligations, a continued state of belligerence and terrorism could fundamentally erode the goodwill necessary for such pacts to function optimally in the long run. This isn’t a threat to abrogate the treaty but a stark reminder that the sustainability of such agreements depends on a minimum level of trust and mutual respect, which sustained hostility actively undermines.
Minister Jaishankar’s statements paint a clear picture of an India that is firm in its resolve, conscious of its strategic independence, and unwavering in its commitment to national security. It’s a message to its neighbours that while peace is desirable, it cannot come at the cost of national integrity or in the shadow of terrorism. India is ready to defend itself, chart its own diplomatic course, and expects its neighbours to reciprocate with actions that foster goodwill, rather than perpetually undermining it. This forward-looking approach seeks to ensure India’s security and prosperity while advocating for a regional environment based on mutual respect and adherence to international norms.